
One-Star Reviews: Everyone Gets Them
If you have never received a one-star review, there might be a reason. Here are a few:
- You haven’t published any books yet.
- You haven’t sold any books yet.
- Nobody has left any reviews.
- You have very few reviews.
- You paid for reviews.
- You write better than every famous writer ever born.
Let’s Examine Some Reviews for Books by Famous Writers
And I’ll review the reviews. Will you agree with my opinion?
Stephen King: The Stand
Note the typo (“authors”). If you’re criticizing someone else’s writing, correct grammar and spelling will help legitimize your remarks.
Stephen King: The Body
This review penalizes the author, when the problem lies with the publisher. The purchaser should have returned the book for a another copy, and contacted Customer Support with their concerns.
J. K. Rowling: The Tales of Beedle the Bard
Here’s another review that has nothing to do with the writing. Perhaps the typo (“order”) was made by a book lover whose second language is English.
George R. R. Martin: A Feast for Crows
Did this person expect a modern author to write like a person who died decades ago? John R. R. Tolkien (notice the spelling) was born in 1892.
Margaret Atwood: The Handmaid’s Tale
I always distrust comments written by people who didn’t finish a book.
And I Could Continue
I haven’t yet discovered a popular writer with thousands of ratings and no one-star reviews.
The Writer’s Lexicon series
and additional resources on my Facebook page.
So … Should You Worry About “Bad” Reviews?
It depends.
Is your writing “bad”? Was the printing “bad”? Or was the reviewer “bad”?
Let’s Do the Math
If you have ten five-star reviews and two one-star reviews, that’s a total of fifty-two points left by twelve people:
52/12=4.3 average rating.
So, yes, the one-star reviews can affect your book’s status in the minds of some prospective readers. However, the more five-star reviews you receive, the less significant the single-stars become.
A Few Motives for One-Star Reviews
Understanding the motive behind a review will help you rate its importance.
#1 Your Writing Is Inadequate
This might be entirely subjective, or you might actually be a bad writer. Deep down, you should know where you fit. However, no matter what, don’t give up.
To parrot an old cliché, practice makes perfect.
#2 Your Cover Is Terrible
Here’s another area where subjectivity reigns. Do you have misgivings about your cover? If so, can you afford the time and/or expense to improve it?
#3 Your Book Doesn’t Fit the Genre
Certain tropes are expected in certain genres. If you ignore those tropes, you might receive negative feedback. Is there enough negative feedback to reclassify the book?
That’s your call. Perhaps your writing will spark a new genre.
#4 Your Book Is Too Expensive
If you’re an indie writer, you control the price. Remember the huge pool (which has become an ocean nowadays) of writers with whom you must compete. Experiment with various prices until you find what works best for you. That may change based on time of year and popularity of your other books.
#5 You Have Piqued a Reviewer’s Pet Peeve
If you write a book critical of something or someone important to a person, they might be just as critical of your writing.
#6 A Rival Is Trying to Sabotage You
It’s difficult to prove this one. On many platforms, people don’t have to use their real names when they leave reviews. If you can prove it, you might be able to get the review deleted. If not, work even harder for more five-star reviews.
Maybe you should be flattered by the jealous rival, who would be better served by concentrating on writing instead of sabotage.
Refer to Let’s Do the Math.
#7 You Have Insulted Someone
On social media. Or in a book group. Or at a writer’s convention. Or …
Caveat: I added this tip after receiving feedback from a few online friends.
These Are Just a Few of the Many Reasons Behind Low Ratings
Remember that the “bad” reviews lend credibility to the “good” ones.
I don’t know about you, but whenever I see a book with dozens of nothing but five-star reviews, I become suspicious. Really? Nobody had anything bad to say about this book?
And the single star is often just a rating. Without a reason for the rating, you have no way to react to it. But savvy readers don’t pay attention to ratings without accompanying reviews.
Don’t Obsess Over Single Stars
- Just as a chef cannot craft a meal that will please every palate, a writer cannot craft a story that will please every booklover.
- Many writers don’t read reviews, preferring to spend their time creating instead of worrying about what others say.
- You might want to check reviews once weekly when a book is first released. However, maybe once every six months works better for established books.
- If several readers have pinpointed the same problem, maybe you should consider it as valid.
Oh, I almost forgot: It’s a bad idea to argue with a reviewer.
Maybe It’s Time to Get Back to Your Writing?
Nobody can write like you do.
The Writer’s Lexicon series
and additional resources on my Facebook page.
Discover more from KathySteinemann.com: Free Resources for Writers
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This post is spot on Kathy. When I’m buying a book, I always read reviews. What you said – more five-star reviews you receive, the less significant the single-stars become, that’s exactly it. If a book has mostly five stars and an odd one star, I am most often not shocked to find it’s a stupid review, or doesn’t match what 95% of other people are saying. All that said, my first (albeit strange) one star review felt like a punch in the stomach. 🙂
Thanks, Debby. I’m with you on the gut punch. That was my reaction too.
Reviews are important, but being able to read the first part of a book before purchasing it is, to me, just as helpful when trying to make a decision.
One-star reviews are often the result of bad advertising targeting: I write mainstream fiction with an embedded love story – some readers on Goodreads have insisted on filing it on their shelves as ‘Romance’ (which the Librarians have told me I can’t do anything about), and I’ve gotten reviews which point out that I don’t follow particular Romance tropes and memes.
Which is true!
I don’t! I’m not writing Romance!
That’s why I don’t do giveaways on Goodreads any more.
My description points out details which an experienced Romance reader would understand do not indicate a Romance – but some readers seem not to take that information in.
I’ve done what I can, but none of us can control how readers find books, and it’s resulted in a few 1*, 2*, and 3* reviews.
I figure it’s par for the course.
I hear you, Alicia. If I read a sci-fi novel that has a romance subplot, I’d never characterize it as romance — but some readers would. It’s a minefield, right? We’re all different, otherwise the world would be filled with a population of lookalikes and thinkalikes.
I have a couple of one star reviews. Not bad for 12 books published. But they did make me smile.
One called my historical novel a ‘childrens’ book’.
Really? It begins with a child having to watch the crucifixion of several men, including his father, by the Romans. What does he give his children to read, I wonder?
I suspect it was because, at the beginning, the protagonist is a child.
Another said ‘Why, oh why don’t they kill off the enemy at the beginning? To keep a weak plot going, that’s why.’
Well, yes! There would be no plot, weak or strong, if that happened.
LOL. It’s so much fun reviewing reviewers. Thanks for the examples, V.M.